Unable to compare with previous version: Unable to find version history at https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4 (Problem #1 with package-list.json at https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4: Not Found)
IPA Comparison:
n/a
IPS Comparison:
n/a
Validation Flags:
On: autoLoad; Off: hintAboutNonMustSupport, anyExtensionsAllowed, checkAggregation, showReferenceMessages, noExperimentalContent, displayWarnings
output/Sub_UC_eMed_06.html#/html/body/div/div/div/div/div/script at Line 280, column 2
warning
The <script> containing the javascript 'import mermaid from '... is illegal and not allowed on the HL7 ci-build - need to put the script in a .js file in a trusted template if this IG is to build on the HL7 ci-build (if it is justified and needed) (also in 12 other files)
The link 'UC_eMed_09.html' for "UC_eMed_09 - Durchgeführte Abgabe schreiben" cannot be resolvedHTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
1
warning
The HTML fragment 'ip-statements.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
2
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [cross-version-analysis.xhtml, cross-version-analysis-inline.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
3
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [dependency-table.xhtml, dependency-table-short.xhtml, dependency-table-nontech.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
4
warning
The HTML fragment 'globals-table.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationdarreichungsform' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem-medikationartanwendung.html' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationdarreichungsform' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem-medikationartanwendung.html' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationdarreichungsform' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem-medikationartanwendung.html' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationdarreichungsform' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem-medikationartanwendung.html' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-05-b-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-05-b-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationdarreichungsform' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem-medikationartanwendung.html' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-05-b-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-05-b-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rulesBUNDLE_BUNDLE_POSSIBLE_MATCH_WRONG_FU
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationdarreichungsform' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem-medikationartanwendung.html' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
CodeSystems SHOULD have a stated value for the caseSensitive element so that users know the status and meaning of the code system clearlyCODESYSTEM_CS_NONHL7_MISSING_ELEMENT
--
CodeSystem (l1/c1842)
error
Code systems published by HL7 SHALL conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.caseSensitive is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING_HL7
--
CodeSystem.concept[0] (l1/c1842)
warning
HL7 Defined CodeSystems should ensure that every concept has a definitionCODESYSTEM_CONCEPT_NO_DEFINITION
CodeSystems SHOULD have a stated value for the caseSensitive element so that users know the status and meaning of the code system clearlyCODESYSTEM_CS_NONHL7_MISSING_ELEMENT
--
CodeSystem (l1/c1608)
error
Code systems published by HL7 SHALL conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.caseSensitive is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING_HL7
--
CodeSystem.concept[0] (l1/c1608)
warning
HL7 Defined CodeSystems should ensure that every concept has a definitionCODESYSTEM_CONCEPT_NO_DEFINITION
Wrong Display Name 'Gerät' for http://snomed.info/sct#49062001. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Device' (en), 'Device, NOS' (en) or 'Device (physical object)' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#49062001 ("Gerät")]"
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#49062001"
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "49062001" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationdarreichungsform' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
Coding has no system. A code with no system has no defined meaning, and it cannot be validated. A system should be providedCoding_has_no_system__cannot_validate
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:recipetype in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:recipetype in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (MedicationRequest.category) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_NoCheckMin
MedicationRequest.category:recipetype: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (MedicationRequest.category) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_NoCheckMin
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationrezeptart' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
The contained resource 'ContainedMedication' is not referenced to from elsewhere in the containing resource nor does it refer to the containing resource (dom-3)CONTAINED_ORPHAN_DOM3
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationdarreichungsform' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem-medikationartanwendung.html' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:recipetype in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:recipetype in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertionsSLICING_CANNOT_BE_EVALUATED
MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (MedicationRequest.category) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_NoCheckMin
MedicationRequest.category:recipetype: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (MedicationRequest.category) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1)Validation_VAL_Profile_NoCheckMin
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationrezeptart' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
The contained resource 'ContainedMedication03' is not referenced to from elsewhere in the containing resource nor does it refer to the containing resource (dom-3)CONTAINED_ORPHAN_DOM3
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/asp-liste' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_QTY_UCUM_ANNOTATIONS_NOT_IN_UNIT
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/hl7-at-organizationtype' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/hl7-at-religionaustria' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/iso-3166-1-alpha-3' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Verabreichungsmethode, z.B. Infusion, Injektion, Tablette, Salbe etc. 'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet-elga-medikationmengenart'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/medikationartanwendung'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Verabreichungsmethode, z.B. Infusion, Injektion, Tablette, Salbe etc. 'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet-elga-medikationmengenart'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet-elga-medikationmengenart on element Dosage.doseAndRate.dose[x].unit could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot.element[9]
error
This element has a Binding but the types [boolean] do not make this kind of constraint relevantSD_ILLEGAL_CHARACTERISTICS
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet-elga-medikationmengenart on element Dosage.doseAndRate.dose[x].unit could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Coding has no system. A code with no system has no defined meaning, and it cannot be validated. A system should be providedCoding_has_no_system__cannot_validate
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#736378000 ("Medikationsplan")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#736378000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "736378000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Coding has no system. A code with no system has no defined meaning, and it cannot be validated. A system should be providedCoding_has_no_system__cannot_validate
The definition for the element 'List.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The definition for the element 'List.entry.flag' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListEntryFlagVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The definition for the element 'List.emptyReason' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListEmptyReasonVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The definition for the element 'List.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The definition for the element 'List.entry.flag' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListEntryFlagVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The definition for the element 'List.emptyReason' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListEmptyReasonVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The string value contains text that looks like embedded HTML tags. If this content is rendered to HTML without appropriate post-processing, it may be a security riskSECURITY_STRING_CONTENT_WARNING
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Mögliche Werte z.B. FFC (First-Fill Complete für vollständig erfüllte Bestellungen), FFP (First-Fill Part Fill für teilweise erfüllte Bestellungen), \nBsp: http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType //ffc, ffp, Refill - Part Fill, refill complete: evtl. selbst definieren\n// für leerabgabe: complete-ausprägung; emergency supply offen (OTC), complete\n\nDer Prozess des „Besorgers“ (wenn ein Arzneimittel nicht lagernd ist und bestellt werden muss) wird in der e-Medikation abgebildet. \nDabei wird das Rezept von der Apotheke eingelöst, und die Abgabe wird als Teilabgabe gekennzeichnet \n(siehe Markierung FFP „First Fill, Part Fill“ oder RFP „Refill - Part Fill“). Die Verordnung wird nicht in den Status EINGELÖST versetzt und es können solange weitere Abgaben dispensiert werden, bis eine Abgabe mit der Markierung RFC „Refill - Complete“ gespeichert wird. Die Kennzeichnung zeigt, dass das Arzneimittel dem Patienten noch nicht ausgehändigt wurde. Die Kennzeichnung zeigt auch, ob alle Packungen einer Verordnung bzw. teilweise Packungen einer Verordnung bestellt werden. Solange eine Abgabe mit der Kennzeichnung „Besorger“ vorhanden ist, muss die Abgabe mit der eMED-ID abrufbar sein.\n\n\"FFC\": First Fill - Complete: <br>\n\"FFP\": First Fill - Part Fill <br> \n\"RFP\": Refill - Part Fill <br> \n\"RFC\": Refill - Complete <br>\n'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The string value contains text that looks like embedded HTML tags. If this content is rendered to HTML without appropriate post-processing, it may be a security riskSECURITY_STRING_CONTENT_WARNING
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The string value contains text that looks like embedded HTML tags. If this content is rendered to HTML without appropriate post-processing, it may be a security riskSECURITY_STRING_CONTENT_WARNING
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Mögliche Werte z.B. FFC (First-Fill Complete für vollständig erfüllte Bestellungen), FFP (First-Fill Part Fill für teilweise erfüllte Bestellungen), \nBsp: http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType //ffc, ffp, Refill - Part Fill, refill complete: evtl. selbst definieren\n// für leerabgabe: complete-ausprägung; emergency supply offen (OTC), complete\n\nDer Prozess des „Besorgers“ (wenn ein Arzneimittel nicht lagernd ist und bestellt werden muss) wird in der e-Medikation abgebildet. \nDabei wird das Rezept von der Apotheke eingelöst, und die Abgabe wird als Teilabgabe gekennzeichnet \n(siehe Markierung FFP „First Fill, Part Fill“ oder RFP „Refill - Part Fill“). Die Verordnung wird nicht in den Status EINGELÖST versetzt und es können solange weitere Abgaben dispensiert werden, bis eine Abgabe mit der Markierung RFC „Refill - Complete“ gespeichert wird. Die Kennzeichnung zeigt, dass das Arzneimittel dem Patienten noch nicht ausgehändigt wurde. Die Kennzeichnung zeigt auch, ob alle Packungen einer Verordnung bzw. teilweise Packungen einer Verordnung bestellt werden. Solange eine Abgabe mit der Kennzeichnung „Besorger“ vorhanden ist, muss die Abgabe mit der eMED-ID abrufbar sein.\n\n\"FFC\": First Fill - Complete: <br>\n\"FFP\": First Fill - Part Fill <br> \n\"RFP\": Refill - Part Fill <br> \n\"RFC\": Refill - Complete <br>\n'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet-elga-medikationmengenart'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet-elga-medikationmengenart'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet-elga-medikationmengenart on element Medication.form could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet-elga-medikationmengenart on element Medication.form could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-medikationrezeptart'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Grund für die Verordnung des Arzneimittels als Code oder Referenz. Bis zur Verfügbarkeit von e-Diagnose keine Verwendung in geplanter Abgabe. 'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-medikationrezeptart'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Grund für die Verordnung des Arzneimittels als Code oder Referenz. Bis zur Verfügbarkeit von e-Diagnose keine Verwendung in geplanter Abgabe. 'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
The definition for the element 'MedicationRequest.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/GeplanteAbgabeStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-medikationrezeptart on element MedicationRequest.category could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
The definition for the element 'MedicationRequest.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/GeplanteAbgabeStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-medikationrezeptart on element MedicationRequest.category could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The definition for the element 'MedicationRequest.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/MedikationsplaneintragStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
The definition for the element 'MedicationRequest.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/MedikationsplaneintragStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimentalSD_ED_EXPERIMENTAL_BINDING
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c188634)
warning
The slice 'reportedReference' on path 'MedicationRequest.reported[x]' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c188634)
warning
The slice 'reportedBoolean' on path 'MedicationRequest.reported[x]' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-medikationfrequenz'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-einnahmezeitpunkte'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-medikationfrequenz'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-einnahmezeitpunkte'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-medikationfrequenz on element Timing.repeat.periodUnit could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-einnahmezeitpunkte on element Timing.repeat.when could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-medikationfrequenz on element Timing.repeat.periodUnit could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
The valueSet reference https://termgit.elga.gv.at/ValueSet/elga-einnahmezeitpunkte on element Timing.repeat.when could not be resolvedSD_ED_BIND_UNKNOWN_VS
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://termgit.elga.gv.at/CodeSystem/atc-deutsch-wido' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
The system 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/medicationdispense-status' is actually a value set, which itself refers to the system 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/medicationdispense-status' so that may be what is intended hereVALUESET_INCLUDE_WRONG_VS_HINT
Error from https://tx.fhir.org/r4: Error: A definition for CodeSystem 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/medicationdispense-status' could not be found, so the value set cannot be expanded (from server, see log)
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType to 3.0.0 from choices of 2.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.5.0)PIN_VERSION
--
ValueSet.compose.include[0] (l1/c1743)
error
The system 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType' is actually a value set, which itself refers to the system 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode' so that may be what is intended hereVALUESET_INCLUDE_WRONG_VS_HINT
--
ValueSet.where(id = 'DurchgefuehrteAbgabeTypVS')
warning
Error from https://tx.fhir.org/r4: Error: A definition for CodeSystem 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType' version '3.0.0' could not be found, so the value set cannot be expanded. No versions of this code system are known (from server, see log)
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-05-b-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-05-b-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 2 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a58 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-02-Mr-Planeintrag-02 by Bundle resolution rules
Entry 1 matches the reference MedicationRequest/At-Emed-Journey-05-b-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by type and id but its fullUrl urn:uuid:62e2daa5-c34b-4b97-8044-fd893bc99a57 does not match the full target URL urn:uuid:At-Emed-Journey-05-b-Mr-Planeintrag-01 by Bundle resolution rules
Code systems published by HL7 SHALL conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.caseSensitive is mandatory, but it is not present
Code systems published by HL7 SHALL conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.caseSensitive is mandatory, but it is not present
The contained resource 'ContainedMedication' is not referenced to from elsewhere in the containing resource nor does it refer to the containing resource (dom-3)
The contained resource 'ContainedMedication03' is not referenced to from elsewhere in the containing resource nor does it refer to the containing resource (dom-3)
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Gerät' for http://snomed.info/sct#49062001. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Device' (en), 'Device, NOS' (en) or 'Device (physical object)' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Medikationsplan' for http://snomed.info/sct#736378000. Valid display is one of 2 choices: 'Medication management plan (record artifact)' (en) or 'Medication management plan' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType to 3.0.0 from choices of 2.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.5.0)
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/list-empty-reason to 1.0.1 from choices of 0.1.0 (hl7.fhir.uv.xver-r5.r4#0.1.0), 1.0.1 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.5.0)
Pinned the version of http://hl7.org/fhir/CodeSystem/medicationrequest-status to 5.0.0 from choices of 4.0.1 (hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.0.0 (hl7.fhir.uv.xver-r5.r4#0.1.0)
Pinned the version of http://hl7.org/fhir/CodeSystem/medicationrequest-status to 5.0.0 from choices of 4.0.1 (hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.0.0 (hl7.fhir.uv.xver-r5.r4#0.1.0)
The definition for the element 'List.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'List.entry.flag' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListEntryFlagVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'List.emptyReason' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListEmptyReasonVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'List.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'List.entry.flag' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListEntryFlagVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'List.emptyReason' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/ElgaListEmptyReasonVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'MedicationRequest.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/GeplanteAbgabeStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'MedicationRequest.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/GeplanteAbgabeStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'MedicationRequest.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/MedikationsplaneintragStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The definition for the element 'MedicationRequest.status' binds to the value set 'https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/ValueSet/MedikationsplaneintragStatusVS' which is experimental, but this structure is not labeled as experimental
The string value contains text that looks like embedded HTML tags. If this content is rendered to HTML without appropriate post-processing, it may be a security risk
The string value contains text that looks like embedded HTML tags. If this content is rendered to HTML without appropriate post-processing, it may be a security risk
The string value contains text that looks like embedded HTML tags. If this content is rendered to HTML without appropriate post-processing, it may be a security risk
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:recipetype in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:recipetype in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:recipetype in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
Slicing cannot be evaluated: Could not match discriminator (coding.code) for slice MedicationRequest.category:recipetype in profile https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1 - the discriminator [coding.code] does not have fixed value, binding or existence assertions
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActSubstanceAdminSubstitutionCode|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-SubstanceAdminSubstitutionReason|3.0.0'
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
UCUM Codes that contain human readable annotations like {Stueck} can be misleading (e.g. they are ignored when comparing units). Best Practice is not to depend on annotations in the UCUM code, so this usage should be checked, and the Quantity.unit 'Stück' SHOULD contain the annotation (it does not)
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Mögliche Werte z.B. FFC (First-Fill Complete für vollständig erfüllte Bestellungen), FFP (First-Fill Part Fill für teilweise erfüllte Bestellungen), \nBsp: http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType //ffc, ffp, Refill - Part Fill, refill complete: evtl. selbst definieren\n// für leerabgabe: complete-ausprägung; emergency supply offen (OTC), complete\n\nDer Prozess des „Besorgers“ (wenn ein Arzneimittel nicht lagernd ist und bestellt werden muss) wird in der e-Medikation abgebildet. \nDabei wird das Rezept von der Apotheke eingelöst, und die Abgabe wird als Teilabgabe gekennzeichnet \n(siehe Markierung FFP „First Fill, Part Fill“ oder RFP „Refill - Part Fill“). Die Verordnung wird nicht in den Status EINGELÖST versetzt und es können solange weitere Abgaben dispensiert werden, bis eine Abgabe mit der Markierung RFC „Refill - Complete“ gespeichert wird. Die Kennzeichnung zeigt, dass das Arzneimittel dem Patienten noch nicht ausgehändigt wurde. Die Kennzeichnung zeigt auch, ob alle Packungen einer Verordnung bzw. teilweise Packungen einer Verordnung bestellt werden. Solange eine Abgabe mit der Kennzeichnung „Besorger“ vorhanden ist, muss die Abgabe mit der eMED-ID abrufbar sein.\n\n\"FFC\": First Fill - Complete: <br>\n\"FFP\": First Fill - Part Fill <br> \n\"RFP\": Refill - Part Fill <br> \n\"RFC\": Refill - Complete <br>\n'
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Mögliche Werte z.B. FFC (First-Fill Complete für vollständig erfüllte Bestellungen), FFP (First-Fill Part Fill für teilweise erfüllte Bestellungen), \nBsp: http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType //ffc, ffp, Refill - Part Fill, refill complete: evtl. selbst definieren\n// für leerabgabe: complete-ausprägung; emergency supply offen (OTC), complete\n\nDer Prozess des „Besorgers“ (wenn ein Arzneimittel nicht lagernd ist und bestellt werden muss) wird in der e-Medikation abgebildet. \nDabei wird das Rezept von der Apotheke eingelöst, und die Abgabe wird als Teilabgabe gekennzeichnet \n(siehe Markierung FFP „First Fill, Part Fill“ oder RFP „Refill - Part Fill“). Die Verordnung wird nicht in den Status EINGELÖST versetzt und es können solange weitere Abgaben dispensiert werden, bis eine Abgabe mit der Markierung RFC „Refill - Complete“ gespeichert wird. Die Kennzeichnung zeigt, dass das Arzneimittel dem Patienten noch nicht ausgehändigt wurde. Die Kennzeichnung zeigt auch, ob alle Packungen einer Verordnung bzw. teilweise Packungen einer Verordnung bestellt werden. Solange eine Abgabe mit der Kennzeichnung „Besorger“ vorhanden ist, muss die Abgabe mit der eMED-ID abrufbar sein.\n\n\"FFC\": First Fill - Complete: <br>\n\"FFP\": First Fill - Part Fill <br> \n\"RFP\": Refill - Part Fill <br> \n\"RFC\": Refill - Complete <br>\n'
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Grund für die Verordnung des Arzneimittels als Code oder Referenz. Bis zur Verfügbarkeit von e-Diagnose keine Verwendung in geplanter Abgabe. '
value should not start or finish with whitespace 'Grund für die Verordnung des Arzneimittels als Code oder Referenz. Bis zur Verfügbarkeit von e-Diagnose keine Verwendung in geplanter Abgabe. '
The system 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/medicationdispense-status' is actually a value set, which itself refers to the system 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/medicationdispense-status' so that may be what is intended here
The system 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPharmacySupplyType' is actually a value set, which itself refers to the system 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode' so that may be what is intended here
MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (MedicationRequest.category) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1)
MedicationRequest.category:recipetype: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (MedicationRequest.category) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1)
MedicationRequest.category:mrcategory: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (MedicationRequest.category) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1)
MedicationRequest.category:recipetype: Found 0 matches, but unable to check minimum required (MedicationRequest.category) due to lack of slicing validation (from https://fhir.hl7.at/elga/emed/r4/StructureDefinition/at-emed-mr-geplante-abgabe|0.1.1)
hl7.at.fhir.elga.emed.r4
hl7.fhir.uv.tools.r4